CRTC to start talks on increased access to rural broadband

The announcement by the CRTC that they will hold a policy hearing in October to examine whether carriers should be required to provide high-speed Internet access to poorly served rural regions in this Globe and Mail article is good news. Of course the response from the telecom/wireless carriers in the article is no surprise . . .

“ The CRTC’s question, at essence, is: Shouldn’t Canadians all have access to broadband service? The problem for everybody is, that’s a nice idea, but who is going to pay for it? You’re talking about hundreds of millions of dollars if you’re going to extend wire line, broadband Internet to rural communities ”— Michael Hennessy, Telus’s senior vice-president for government and regulatory affairs

Boo-Hoo! Imagine that, the big telecoms (Telus, Bell, Rogers) may actually have to dip into their huge profits to improve services to its customer base. Sounds like Mr. Hennessy and his cohorts are just setting the stage to beg for a hand-out from the Canadian government in the form of a subsidy to do what they should be doing anyway. The fact of the matter is, the UK and the US governments are pouring huge amounts of taxpayer money into improving rural broadband access so it might not be a bad idea for the Canadian Fed’s to do the same for it’s citizens living outside the current profit-rich corridors of internet access. The whining and crying from the telecoms was to be expected.

Here in Central Alberta you don’t need to go far to lose access to high-speed broadband. Fifteen minutes off the main corridor (QE II highway) and you’re into dial-up country. These folks aren’t hillbillies or hippies living in some hard to get to mountain hide-away. A ten minute drive east or west of Red Deer Alberta (population 89,000 plus) and you have few choices for internet access. In some areas even air-cards won’t work due to scarcity of towers. Sure it costs money to build out the infrastructure but these folks deserve access to internet in the same way people living in dense metro areas such as Toronto do. Government information, services for seniors, educational access for children and even arts, culture and news via the web are as important to the rural population as they are to those living in downtown Vancouver. Maybe even more important since it keeps them connected to the global world around them.

There is a digital divide occurring in regards to high-speed internet access and it needs to be addressed by our federal and provincial governments. Let’s hope the CRTC has the vision and more importantly the back-bone to do something about this.

Dean

BTW Mr. Hennessy, how are the executive bonuses doing this year?

Add comment February 7, 2010

Our latest video: Penhold Community Breakfast Jan 30, 2010

In an attempt to become a serious citizen journalist, I went out and covered a local event here in Penhold. Thanks to all the folks from the town – Julia, Tara and Dean – who took part. Hoping to do more in the future.

BTW: Citizen journalism isn’t hard. If I can do it – you can too! Just pay attention, tell a story and hold your camera steady (a tri-pod helps). This video was shot with the Kodak Zi8 – a hi-def vid cam that is simple to use and costs less than $200CDN.

Let me know about your interest in citizen journalism. There are a few of us around and maybe can get a Tweetup or MeetUP going here in Central Alberta.

Dean

Add comment January 31, 2010

Does local TV matter?

We have been working recently with Fred May Jr. from CentralAlbertaTV.net and we shot this in his studio down in Olds Alberta. Fred has been in mainstream broadcasting for over thirty years and has switched to web based video and TV because he believes that it is the future of delivering local TV programing. I do to. He let me rant about big broadcasters and cable companies and is running it in his TV feed from CentralAlbertaTV.net.

Let me know what you think about the current state of local TV (which is going down hill daily!) and will local TV via the web be the future?

Dean

Add comment January 31, 2010

The iNewton – Apple’s new touch screen computer?

Sorry I couldn’t resist. Everyone is coming up with names for the new (rumoured) Apple touch screen computer and since I remember the Newton I thought it would be good for a laugh. For those who weren’t around when the Newton came out and took the industry by storm (actually it was more of a drizzle) it was good idea ahead of it’s time. As an idea it was ground breaking. As a device it was a failure. The handwriting recognition was so poor that whatever you wrote would come back totally unrecognizable. But it did spark the idea that you could carry a computer in your pocket. Think about it – first the Newton, then PDA’s, then along came the smartphone.

As bad as it was, the Newton was typical of the innovation that was and may still be Apple. Steve Jobs is, was and will always be a genius. I can’t help but wonder why he hasn’t come up with a touch screen computer before now. I mean a real computer, not just an entertainment device.

Personally I think touch screen computers have a limited and niche use. Maybe Steve Jobs does too and that is why Apple has been behind the curve on this. It’s not like Apple (or The Steve) to give the public something just because they are clamoring for it. Jobs is usually a few steps ahead of everyone else. He gave us the iPod and iTunes and the iPhone even when we didn’t know we needed them. Instead of the iNewton he’ll release something we didn’t expect and within twenty-four hours we’ll wonder how we lived this long without it.

Dean

BTW: In case you haven’t seen this one before . . .

1 comment January 26, 2010

Shaw interested in Canwest assets

It sounds like Jim Shaw, who brought us such things as Shaw cable is looking over the bric-a-brac at the  Canwest yard sale. Reports say he is doing this to see what he can do to ‘help them out’. That’s mighty neighborly of Jim. It’s also a great business strategy. Thirty years ago cable was a fledgling industry looking for breaks and the broadcasters where rich and on-top of the game. Now things have reversed and the cableco’s have the cash to buy up the broadcasters stuff. Good for Shaw but is it good for the viewers? Is it even legal?

Is it in our best interests as consumers of content to have our media controlled by a single source? As one Tweeter suggested on the #CRTC topic if acquisitions like this become popular the CRTC will have only one company to regulate. Think about it – Shaw would control content development, production and distribution. Wasn’t there issues with this in the US decades ago in the movie business and the fed’s broke it up? And it seems to me that there are laws concerning a single entity owning all of the media assets in a local market – radio, papers, tv? Oh wait, it’s the CRTC who regulates this.

Is Canwest-Global too big to fail?

Dean

Add comment January 19, 2010

Previous Posts


FREE Subscription

BRASScast Episodes

Subscribe through Email

Twitter Updates

BRASScast Sponsors

Nova Media Strategic Online Marketing

Advanced Systems

Links

find-us-on-facebook-badge

finduson-youtubelabel-copy

Podcasters in Alberta label

rfrd-square

Red Deer Chamber of Commerce

RSS Nova Media Blog Posts

Watch videos at Vodpod and other videos from this collection.

Advanced Systems Twitter